Seven campaigns have run since 2019 and no two of them behaved the same way. One produced twelve detentions across four thousand ships. One was declared satisfactory and was followed within eight months by an unannounced second campaign that found the same equipment in worse condition. The useful question is not which topic came up in which year — it is what each questionnaire actually found when it was answered honestly, because that is the only part of the record that tells you where the next one will bite.

The campaign that was called satisfactory, and what happened eight months later

Fire doors, Paris MoU: non-compliance before and after the industry was told to fix it 9.3% 13.9% fire doors fire doors 2023 campaign Sep to Nov, compliance called satisfactory July 2024 follow-up unannounced, four weeks, same equipment worse, not better About 30% of the 2024 failures were safety management, not the doors.
Campaign readiness
Know what the last campaign found before the next one starts

Why two campaigns on the same ship feel completely different

A campaign is a questionnaire that rides along with an ordinary inspection for three months, and the way it behaves depends almost entirely on what kind of thing it asks about. Topics fall into two families, and the published results separate cleanly along that line.

Documentary topics

Employment agreements, record books, manuals, certificates. A question can be answered from paper that is either present or absent, so compliance rates run high and detentions stay low. The findings concentrate in the gap between what the document says and what the ship does.
High compliance, few detentions, quiet outcome

Mechanical topics

Fire doors, ballast treatment plant, stability instruments. The question is answered by operating something in front of the officer, which cannot be prepared the night before. Compliance rates fall, and a meaningful share of the failures reach detention level.
Lower compliance, real detentions, loud outcome

Knowing which family a topic belongs to is worth more than knowing the topic itself, because it tells a technical department whether to brief the crew or to budget for parts. For 2026 the answer is unambiguous, which is covered further down.

The campaigns and what each one found

Figures below are as published by the authority named in each row. Campaign results are reported differently by different regimes, so the rows are not a league a vessel can be ranked in — they show what each questionnaire exposed.

Year Topic Published outcome What the questionnaire exposed
2019Emergency systems and proceduresJoint Paris and Tokyo campaignEmergency arrangements as operated rather than as fitted
2020No campaignDeferredThe only gap year in the modern sequence
2021Stability in general3,995 questionnaires, 12 detentions from the topic (0.30%), 200 findings — Paris MoUDraught and displacement cross-checks (5.4% negative) and periodic verification of the stability instrument (4.8%)
2022STCW4,112 questionnaires of 4,179 inspections, 571 findings — Paris MoUFindings nearly tripled against 2021 on a topic widely assumed to be documentary
2023Fire safety3,856 questionnaires, compliance judged satisfactory — Paris MoUFire doors 9.3% negative and fire drill performance 9.2%, which triggered a follow-up campaign in 2024
2024Crew wages and employment agreements3,863 questionnaires, 30 detentions (0.78%), average compliance 98.7% — Paris MoUAgreements missing required elements (2.8% negative) and access to employment information (2.7%)
2025Ballast water management624 questionnaires, 16 detentions from the topic (2.56%), 9.46% of questionnaires carrying a negative answer — Black Sea MoUTreatment plant condition, record book completion and crew familiarity accounted for 89.3% of all non-compliance
2026Cargo securing1 September to 30 November 2026, Paris and Tokyo with most other regimes joiningDocumentation and planning, securing practice, and the condition of the securing equipment itself

2021, stability: the quiet campaign that was not about stability

Twelve detentions out of 3,995 questionnaires is as close to a non-event as a campaign gets. The content of the failures is the part worth keeping. The two weakest questions were whether there was evidence on board that the calculated displacement and trim agreed with the observed draughts, and whether the accuracy of the stability instrument was verified periodically against an approved test condition.

Neither is a stability question in the engineering sense. Both ask whether a routine is being carried out and whether there is evidence of it afterwards. The ships that failed were not short of stability; they were ships where a cross-check happened in somebody’s head and was never written down. That shape repeats in every campaign that follows.

2022, STCW: a documentary topic that bit anyway

The 2022 campaign was answered on 4,112 ships and produced 571 findings against 200 the year before — close to three times the rate on a subject most operators treated as a paperwork exercise. The reason is that rest-hour compliance is not a document, it is an arithmetic consequence of how a ship is manned and worked, and the records either reconcile with the watch system or they do not.

The campaign also demonstrated a limit on what a questionnaire can enforce. Several items carried no detention recommendation at all, because the non-compliance had already happened and could not be put right before departure. A finding can be recorded, and follow the vessel, without the ship being held — which is the distinction set out in our guide to the deficiencies that lead to detention.

2023, fire safety: satisfactory, and then the follow-up

The Paris MoU Committee reviewed 3,856 questionnaires and concluded that overall compliance appeared satisfactory. Inside that verdict sat two numbers: fire doors failing at 9.3% and fire drill performance at 9.2%. The Committee said it expected the industry to deal with them.

Sep–Nov 2023

The campaign runs

Fire doors fail on 9.3% of questionnaires. The overall verdict is satisfactory, which most operators read as a subject now closed.
Early 2024

The expectation is published

The authority states that it expects the industry to improve on the two weak items. No new obligation is imposed and nothing is announced.
July 2024

An unannounced follow-up

A four-week focused campaign on fire doors alone, with no notice period and no questionnaire circulated in advance.
The result

13.9% non-compliance

Higher than during the campaign that prompted it. Around 30% of the failures were traced to weak safety-management implementation rather than to the doors themselves.

Two lessons sit in that sequence. A satisfactory verdict is a statement about the fleet average, not about your ship. And a campaign that identifies a weak item has not finished with it — the weak item is now a named target, and the next look at it may come without notice.

2024, crew wages: 98.7% compliant and still worth reading

The 2024 campaign on crew wages and employment agreements is the cleanest result in the series: 3,863 questionnaires, average compliance of 98.7%, and 30 ships held — 0.78%. On the surface a campaign that found almost nothing.

What it did find was specific. The worst item asked whether the employment agreement contained all the elements the convention requires, with 2.8% answering no, and four of those turning into detentions. The second worst asked whether the seafarer could access information about their own employment conditions on board, at 2.7%. Both failures are in the content of a document that was present and signed. The agreement existed; it was simply incomplete, and nobody had read it against the requirement.

CIC
Run the questionnaire on your own fleet first
Marine Inspection holds the campaign questions as a checklist against each vessel, with the evidence attached, so a negative answer is found by your own people in August rather than by an officer in October.

2025, ballast water: the campaign that found hardware

Ballast water broke the pattern of the preceding years. Where the Black Sea MoU reported, 624 of 775 inspections carried the questionnaire, 9.46% of them recorded at least one negative answer, and 16 ships were held on the topic — a 2.56% rate against the 0.30% of 2021 and the 0.78% of 2024.

The composition of the failures matters more than the rate. Roughly 89.3% of all non-compliance fell into three areas: the operating condition of the treatment system, completion of the record book, and crew familiarity with the management plan. Across the wider regional picture the treatment system alone accounted for about 46% of the findings serious enough to hold a ship, with crew training at 21% and the plan itself at 15%.

46%
The treatment system itself
Poor maintenance, missing spares and plant that would not run on demand. Nothing that can be arranged in the days before arrival.
21%
Crew training
People operating installed equipment they had not been properly trained on, which shows immediately when the officer asks for a demonstration.
15%
The management plan
The document on board not matching the equipment fitted, or the operation actually being carried out.

What all seven campaigns have in common

Lay the results side by side and the topics stop looking like the variable. The same four failure modes appear in every campaign regardless of subject, which is what makes the pattern useful.

The four things every campaign finds, whatever it is about Crew familiarityNo evidencePlant not kept upPaper and ship People operatingequipment theywere never shownproperly. The routine is donebut nothing iswritten down, so itcannot be shown. Installed systemswithout spares ormaintenance, foundonly on demand. The manual onboard describes aship other thanthis one. 2021 stability, 2022 rest hours, 2023 fire doors, 2024 employment agreements, 2025 treatment plant — four shapes, five subjects.

Not one of the weakest questionnaire items across six years asked whether a piece of equipment existed. Every one of them asked whether it was being kept, operated or recorded. That is the thing a campaign measures, and it is why a fleet with a working routine tends to pass campaigns it did not specifically prepare for — you can see in a short demo how that routine is recorded across a fleet.

Reading 2026 against the record

The 2026 campaign runs from 1 September to 30 November on cargo securing, with the Paris and Tokyo regimes leading and most other regimes joining. The questionnaire covers three areas: documentation and planning, securing practice, and the condition and availability of the securing equipment. If you want the questionnaire running against your own vessels before September, book a demo and walk through it with us.

It is a mechanical topic
The third area — approved gear, its maintenance, the fixed and loose devices — is answered by producing equipment and showing its condition. On the 2025 evidence that is where the detention-level findings concentrate, not in the manual.
Crew familiarity will be tested
Every campaign since 2021 has produced failures from people being asked to explain or demonstrate something they had not been taken through. A securing manual nobody has worked from is the same failure in a new subject.
The evidence gap is the likely weak item
Checks on stack weights, lashing condition and heavy-weather procedure are carried out routinely and recorded rarely. That combination produced the worst item in 2021 and it is the easiest thing to put right before September.
A satisfactory result closes nothing
If one or two items stand out, the pattern says they become a named target. Fire doors moved from a campaign item to an unannounced four-week campaign of their own within eight months.

What the campaign does to a vessel’s standing afterwards, and how questionnaire findings feed the risk calculation that decides inspection frequency, is covered in our guide to the Tokyo MoU targeting regime. The month-by-month preparation plan for the 2026 campaign is set out in our CIC 2026 preparation guide.

How Marine Inspection handles what the campaigns find

The record is consistent across every subject: campaigns do not find missing equipment, they find missing practice and missing evidence. Each of the four recurring failure modes is a recording problem before it is an engineering one, which is the part a system can carry.

The campaign findsCrew operating installed equipment they were never properly taken through, which shows the moment a demonstration is asked for.
Marine InspectionFamiliarisation tracked by name against each piece of equipment and each plan, so a crew change does not quietly reset the answer an officer is going to ask for.
The campaign findsA routine carried out but never written down — the worst item in 2021 and the recurring one in 2023 and 2025.
Marine InspectionChecks recorded where they happen, with photographs, dates and the name of whoever did them, so the evidence exists without anybody building a file for it afterwards.
The campaign findsInstalled plant that will not run on demand, with no spares and no maintenance history — 46% of the detention-level findings in 2025.
Marine InspectionTreatment systems, doors and securing gear on scheduled routines with spares and overdue work visible from ashore, long before a campaign window opens.
The campaign findsA manual or plan on board describing a ship other than this one, or an agreement that is signed but incomplete.
Marine InspectionDocuments held against the vessel they belong to, with the campaign questions kept as a live checklist so a negative answer is found by your own people in August rather than by an officer in October.

The practical result is that a campaign stops being an event to prepare for. The weak item is visible across the fleet as soon as one vessel reports it, which matters most when a campaign names a target and comes back for it without notice.

CIC focus topics and results: frequently asked questions

What topics have the campaigns covered since 2019?

Emergency systems and procedures in 2019, no campaign in 2020, stability in general in 2021, STCW in 2022, fire safety in 2023, crew wages and employment agreements in 2024, ballast water management in 2025, and cargo securing in 2026.

Which campaign produced the most detentions?

On a like-for-like basis, ballast water in 2025. Where the Black Sea MoU reported, 2.56% of questionnaires led to a detention on the topic, against 0.78% for crew wages in 2024 and 0.30% for stability in 2021 under the Paris MoU. Mechanical topics detain; documentary topics mostly do not.

Does a satisfactory campaign result mean the topic is finished?

No. The 2023 fire safety campaign was judged satisfactory overall, but fire doors had failed on 9.3% of questionnaires. In July 2024 the Paris MoU ran an unannounced four-week follow-up campaign on fire doors alone and found 13.9% non-compliance — worse than during the campaign that prompted it.

Why was there no campaign in 2020?

2020 is the only gap in the modern sequence; the campaign that would have run was deferred and the series resumed with stability in 2021. It is the reason a year-by-year list of topics has one blank row in it.

What do the campaigns actually find?

Four things, in every campaign regardless of subject: crew who were never properly shown the equipment, routines carried out but never recorded, installed systems not maintained or without spares, and documents that describe a different ship. None of the weakest questionnaire items across six years asked whether equipment existed.

How should a fleet prepare for the 2026 cargo securing campaign?

Treat it as a mechanical topic. Put the securing equipment on a maintenance routine with spares, take the crew through the approved manual by name rather than by circular, and start recording the checks on stack weights, lashing condition and heavy-weather procedure that are already being done but rarely written down.
Before 1 September
Answer the questionnaire yourself while there is still time to fix the answer
Marine Inspection holds campaign questions as a live checklist across the fleet, keeps the evidence attached to the routine that produces it, and tracks who has been taken through what — so the weak item is found by your own people in August, not by an officer in October.